News

Murdered in cold blood while on their way to get pizza: Final moments of two best friends before they were hunted down by machete gang in case of mistaken identity – as families pay tribute to pair who ‘wouldn’t hurt a fly’

Best friends Max Dixon and Mason Rist were on their way to buy pizza when they were senselessly ‘hunted down’ and murdered by a machete gang in a case of mistaken identity.

Forming a close bond from an early age, Max, 16, and Mason, 15, had grown up together. They went to the same nursery, junior and secondary school and spent their time chatting and gaming on the PlayStation.

January 27 was no different – the teenagers wanted to spend time together. CCTV shows Max calling round Mason’s house in Ilminster Avenue, Knowle, Bristol, at 11.13pm and the pair can be seen walking down the street to go and pick up a pizza.

Max’s mother, Leanne Ekland, was heading to bed and Mason’s mum, Nikki Knight, was enjoying a rare night out with friends.

Although they knew their sons were close, they were unaware that they were meeting up and going out for food.

But seconds after setting off, the young boys were chased and knifed to death in a horrific attack, just yards away from Mason’s front door after being wrongly identified as the culprits of an attack on a house that happened just an hour earlier.

Their heartbroken families today paid tribute to the ‘innocent’ pair who ‘wouldn’t hurt a fly’ – as they rejoiced at the attackers being brought to justice.

Anthony Snook, 45, Riley Tolliver, 18, and three teenagers aged 15, 16 and 17 – who cannot be named for legal reasons – were today convicted of the murders of Max and Mason.

Max and Mason suffered ‘unsurvivable’ stab wounds and died in hospital, while the murderers drove off in their car before burning their clothing in an attempt to cover their tracks.

Leanne Ekland, Max’s mother, said her son and Mason had known each other since nursery school.

‘The last six weeks have been emotionally draining,’ she said. ‘Today’s outcome doesn’t change the fact that two families go home without their boys.

‘We can now hopefully begin to process that and remember them both and the happy memories that both families have of Max and Mason.

‘I need to thank everyone that’s been involved in our case. I have so much respect for the hard work, dedication and support for our families.

‘There are no words to express how thankful I am to everyone. I will be forever grateful to them.

‘I wish we didn’t have to be here today, but we’ve got some sort of justice for our boys.’

In a statement released after the verdicts, Mason’s family said: ‘Our family is like a jigsaw puzzle and, with the loss of Mason, it is like a part of our jigsaw is gone forever and will never be complete.

‘Mason was a quiet boy who would never hurt a fly. He was just so lovely and innocent.

‘It is impossible to put into words how we feel. This whole process has been incredibly hard and hearing what we have heard, what happened to him, it is horrible to think about Mason’s last moments.

On the evening of January 27 2024, Mason Rist, 15, and Max Dixon, 16, were attacked and killed in the Knowle West area of Bristol.

Here is a timeline of the attack:

– Saturday January 27, 2024

10:07pm: Three men armed with machetes throw bricks at the windows of a property in Hartcliffe, injuring a woman. The attack is captured on CCTV.

10:48pm: Antony Snook, 45, and a 16-year-old return to Hartcliffe from Swindon in Snook’s Audi Q2. They had bought a mobile phone.

10:57pm: Snook, the 16-year-old and a 17-year-old leave the Hartcliffe property in Snook’s car. They pick up a 15-year-old and Riley Tolliver, 18, from a nearby street. Three are armed with machetes while Tolliver has a baseball bat. They head to the rival Knowle West district.

11:13pm: The Audi arrives in Ilminster Avenue, Knowle West.

11:13pm: Max calls round to his friend Mason’s home in Ilminster Avenue. They leave the property almost immediately. Within seconds the Audi drives past the friends, turns around, and heads back towards them.

11:14pm: The Audi stops and the four armed teenagers get out and chase after Max and Mason. The attack on the two boys lasts just 33 seconds. The car then leaves the scene. The 15-year-old and Tolliver are dropped off.

11:21pm: Snook and the 16 and 17-year-old return to the Hartcliffe property. Within minutes items of clothing are being burned in the back garden.

11:29pm: Snook arrives back at his home address on Dowling Road.

– Sunday January 28

0:12am: Mason arrives at Bristol Children’s Hospital.

0:15am: Snook is arrested at his home address.

0:33am: Max arrives at Southmead Hospital.

0:49am: Mason is declared dead.

1:02am: Max is declared dead.

1:08am: The 16 and 17-year-old travel to a block of flats in a taxi. They arrive 15 minutes later.

5:07am: The 16-year-old leaves the flat.

5:22am: The 16-year-old returns carrying McDonald’s takeaway and drinks.

‘These dangerous individuals took away our son, brother, nephew, uncle and grandchild and we must now navigate the rest of our lives without our missing puzzle piece.

‘From the bottom of our hearts, we want to thank everyone worked so hard on this case.

‘The investigation team for being so hard working and dedicated, we appreciate it wasn’t easy working endless hours and under pressure but it is because of you we got this result.

‘The family wouldn’t have been able to get through this unbearable time without having the best family liaison officers assigned to us.

‘They have gone above and beyond to ensure we are always updated, guided and supported throughout this awful process.’

The defendants sat impassively and stared straight ahead as the verdicts were delivered, while the victims’ relatives in the public gallery cried as the guilty verdicts were gives. Others cheered and punched the air.

After Max and Mason left the property in Ilminster Avenue, they were ‘hunted down’ within seconds and stabbed to death in a case of mistaken identity.

CCTV footage shown to the jury captured the gang of five men getting out of a car holding machetes before setting on the fleeing teenagers in a frenzied attack lasting just 33 seconds.

In footage of officers arresting Tolliver at his home, he is heard asking if he can have a ‘puff’ on his ‘blue razz cherry’ vape before being taken away.

Tolliver says: ‘Can I have a go on my puff before I go though. It’s a puff… Can’t I? It’s just blue razz cherry. Nicotine.’

Officers refuse, explaining that they don’t want to ’cause issues’ and there could be ‘cannabis in it which could affect your ability to be interviewed’.

Tolliver is also heard asking if he can ‘stand up’ and whether officers can loosen his cuffs.

At another point, he gives police permission to tell his grandmother why he has been arrested.

The two boys had been wrongly identified as being responsible for bricks being thrown at a house in the rival Hartcliffe district at 10.07pm that evening.

Around 50 minutes later, Snook left the property with two of the boys and picked up the other two in a nearby street before heading to Knowle West.

The Audi Q2 was driven around Knowle West for at least 12 minutes before the attack, the jury was told.

Snook drove down Ilminster Avenue and when they saw Mason and Max in the street they wrongly believed they had spotted those responsible for the attack.

Ray Tully KC, prosecuting, told the jury: ‘They were entirely wrong about that. Max and Mason had absolutely nothing to do with any earlier incident and no connection whatsoever with those events.’

Tolliver, who had a baseball bat, and the three teenagers armed with machetes jumped out of the car and chased after the two boys.

Max and Mason are seen going to different sides of the street, each pursued by two people from the vehicle.

Tolliver and the 15-year-old boy attacked Mason, while the 16-year-old boy and 17-year-old boy chased Max.

The 17-year-old boy also struck Mason, who was lying injured on the ground, as he headed back to the Audi after attacking Max.

A CCTV camera on Mason’s nearby house captured how the attack lasted just 33 seconds from the car pulling up to the teenagers getting back in and leaving.

Mason and Max sustained fatal stab injuries, and both died in hospital in the early hours of January 28.

Snook drove the teenagers from the scene and dropped them off in Knowle West.

A fire was lit in a back garden and items linked to the attack disposed of.

Meanwhile, the 16-year-old boy picked up a McDonald’s meal and drinks just six hours after the attack.

Giving evidence, Snook claimed he thought he was driving the teenagers in his Audi Q2 disability car to a ‘safe house’ after the attack on the Hartcliffe property.

When he was told to stop in Ilminster Avenue he believed they were outside the safe house, Snook alleged.

The landscape gardener, who lost a leg in a road accident, insisted he did not know the boys were carrying weapons and was looking in his rear view mirror at the time Max and Mason were attacked.

‘I thought they had got into a fight or something. I didn’t want to be involved with it. I didn’t think it was something that cost two people their lives,’ he said.

‘I just thought it was something stupid between Hartcliffe and Knowle that I had been dragged into. I didn’t realise anyone had been seriously hurt.’

The four teenagers did not give evidence during the trial.

But the jury was told the 16-year-old had been covertly recorded in custody saying he had heard Mason screaming during the attack and ‘had to sort of join in’.

He also said he had put on ‘loads more tracksuits’ and left his phone behind before heading to Knowle West.

In closing speeches to the jury, barristers representing the teenagers said there was no joint plan to attack the two boys.

Anna Vigars KC, representing the 16-year-old, suggested her client did not have any intention to kill or cause really serious harm to Max or Mason.

‘He didn’t spring into action – he gets left behind. He didn’t know what the plan was, if there was a plan,’ Mrs Vigars said.

‘It isn’t just that his heart was not in it, but his intention was not either.’

Christopher Quinlan KC, representing the 17-year-old, said his client had admitted the manslaughter of Max but denied inflicting any injury to Mason.

The jury were shown the CCTV footage of Mason, after being struck by the 15-year-old, getting to his feet, with prosecutors then alleging the 17-year-old inflicted a second blow to him.

But Mr Quinlan suggested an alternative, telling jurors: ‘He had managed to get to his feet but because of the injury he sustained he wasn’t able to stand, as the 17-year-old passes him.

‘We say when you divorce Mason’s movements from the 17-year-old then the evidence is not there that he did stab him or make contact with him.’

Ignatius Hughes KC, representing Riley Tolliver, said his client had not struck Mason with a ‘sword, machete or zombie knife’.

‘A baseball bat is a very different choice of weapon to go out with than a great big zombie knife,’ he said.

‘He had an opportunity to cause really serious injury to Mason, but he didn’t do it.’

Kate Brunner KC, representing the 15-year-old, said he was not involved in the fatal attack on Max because it happened at the same time he was murdering Mason.

‘He has told you the terrible thing that he did. He was 14 when he stabbed Mason,’ she added.

‘He says that he did that, he’s been honest with this court and with you by saying guilty.’

Mason’s uncle David Knight added: ‘We would like to say a massive thank you to Detective Superintendent Gary Haskins and all his team.

‘They promised us right at the beginning that they would do everything in their power and they have. They’ve got them.

‘We would like to thank the jury for having to see what we’ve seen, and no-one should ever see any of that.

‘We want to thank them for coming to the correct decision.’

Speaking after the verdicts, Detective Superintendent Gary Haskins, senior investigating officer at Avon and Somerset Police, said Max and Mason had been going for a pizza when they were fatally attacked in a case of mistaken identity.

‘They are beautiful boys, going about their business, in their own community when they were senselessly attacked by the individuals for no reason,’ he told the PA news agency.

‘What we know is that they passed Max when he was walking towards Mason’s house. Then Mason walks out of his house and joins Max.

‘The vehicle is passing, they think ‘that’s them, they will do’. They were hunting around Knowle to find people.

‘We know they had driven around Knowle two and a half times before they came across these two boys.’

Snook will be sentenced on November 19 at Bristol Crown Court.

The other four defendants will be sentenced on December 16 following the preparation of pre-sentence reports.

Trial judge Mrs Justice May thanked the jury for their work over the last five weeks.

‘Jury service is probably the most important public service you are asked to make,’ she said.

‘Some cases are particularly demanding on a jury and we are all aware this has been one of those.’

Vicky Cook, chief crown prosecutor for CPS South West, said: ‘The deaths of Max and Mason sent shockwaves through their community and the city of Bristol.

‘The Crown Prosecution Service worked closely with our colleagues in the Avon and Somerset major crime investigation team to build our case.

‘This was that all five defendants were jointly responsible for the murders of both Max and Mason.

‘Regardless of which individuals caused any of the fatal injuries, the evidence shows that all five were working together and share joint responsibility for this terrible crime.

‘The four youths armed themselves and went hunting for people to attack. When they came across Max and Mason, they launched a brutal, joint attack that left both boys fatally injured.

‘Antony Snook drove the youths around while they looked for people to attack. He knew that they were heavily armed and out for revenge. He could have been in no doubt about what they intended to do.

‘Snook waited for the youths while they carried out their cowardly attack, then acted as their getaway driver, helping them to escape the scene.

‘Today’s verdicts serve as a reminder that the carrying of knives and other bladed weapons can only lead to tragedy.

‘The loss that has been suffered by the families of Max and Mason is simply unimaginable, and our thoughts remain with them.’

Related Posts

南太平洋のバヌアツ沖でM7.3の地震 日本人の被害確認されず(2024年12月17日)

南太平洋のバヌアツ諸島で規模の大きな地震が発生しました。日本人の被害は確認されていません。 アメリカ地質調査所によりますと、17日、バヌアツ諸島の首都ポートビラの沖合を震源とする地震が発生しました。 震源の深さは57キロ、地震の規模を示すマグニチュードは7.3と推定され、ロイター通信は少なくとも1人が死亡したと報じています。 外務省によりますと、現地では建物が倒壊するなどしましたが、日本大使館や日本人への被害は今のところ確認されていないということです。 気象庁は現地で最大25センチの津波を観測した一方、日本への津波の影響はないとしています。 また、オーストラリア当局とフィリピン当局も、それぞれ「この地震による津波の恐れはない」と発表しています。

【速報】大阪市生野区で火事 消防車など37台が出動し消火活動中

大阪市消防によりますと17日午後3時ごろ大阪市生野区で火事が発生しているということです。 建物の1階2階部分約200平方メートルが燃えているとのことですが、けが人や逃げ遅れについてはまだわかっていません。 消防車など37台が出動し消火活動中だということです。

アパート火災で爆発音 男性死亡 神奈川・横須賀市【スーパーJチャンネル】(2024年12月17日)

神奈川県横須賀市の市営アパートで火事があり、火元の部屋の男性が死亡しました。 17日午前6時半ごろ、横須賀市の市営アパートの一室で爆発音を伴う火事がありました。 警察などによりますと、火は約2時間半後に消し止められましたが、この部屋に住む坂本秋満さんが死亡しました。 警察は出火の原因を調べています。

【追悼】中山美穂さんの“育ての親”が明かす「デビュー当時の約束」と、共演の中野英雄が明かす“忘れられない素顔”

「ありがとう、美穂。本当に頑張ったね……」 12月12日、都内で行われた中山美穂さんの葬儀に参列した“育ての親”は、そう別れを告げたという。 中山さんは12月6日、都内の自宅で亡くなった。54歳で急逝した元トップアイドルの訃報に、悲しみの声があふれた。所属事務所の発表によると、死因は入浴中の不慮の事故。事件性はないとされる。 「葬儀では、もう涙が止まらなくて。人生で一番泣いたんじゃないかってぐらい。私は独身ですし、美穂は娘のような存在でした。2人で芸能事務所を立ち上げて、人生の半分は一緒にいたんですから」 冒頭に続けてそう語るのは、中山さんの所属していた芸能事務所『ビッグアップル』の創業者・山中則男氏。中山さんを発掘し、世に送り出した人物だ。 1982年、中山さんの人生は、山中氏との出会いによって動き出す。 「私が東京の原宿でスカウトし、その後に母親と3人で食事をしたときのことです。美穂は“お母さんは、すっごく苦労してきたの。だからね私、頑張って、頑張って、お母さんに家を建ててあげたいの”と、涙を流しながら言うんです。その言葉を聞き、私は新たに自分が代表の事務所を立ち上げることを決めました」(山中氏、以下同) オーディションで軒並み落選するも 1980年代は、毎年のように数多のアイドルがデビューしていた。中森明菜や小泉今日子のように輝けるのは、ほんのひと握り。 「私が新しく事務所を立ち上げると言ったら、周囲は“何を考えているんだ、おまえはばかか”と、散々言われました。でも、私は絶対に売れると信じていたんです」 オーディションは軒並み落選。多くのレコード会社も興味を示さなかった。だが、中山さんに可能性を見いだした人物がいた。レコード会社『キングレコード』で音楽ディレクターだった福住朗氏だ。福住氏が話す。 「第一印象は、目力がすごい子だなって思いました。無口でしたが、この子には何かありそうだと思って、デモテープを録ることにしたんです」 中山さんは、中森明菜の『スローモーション』を選んで歌い、福住氏は、その姿に圧倒されたという。 「とにかく歌っている表情が素晴らしくよかった。声に透明感があり、言葉がすごくキレイに聞こえたんです。まだレッスンとかやっているわけじゃないのに、いい感じだなって。なにより発散する圧力が違う。人は、それをオーラと呼ぶのでしょうが、美穂さんは、それがすごく強い人でした」(福住氏、以下同) 魅了された福住氏は、社内で中山さんを猛烈にプッシュしたが反対される。 「キングレコードは、アイドルというジャンルに経験がなかった。先輩スタッフからは“やめておいたほうがいい、考え直せ”と、かなり反対されました。けれど、若造だった私は余計に燃えて(笑)」 デビュー前に「私、頑張りますから」 1989年、『VirginEyes』を熱唱する中山美穂さん 多くが、その可能性を否定したが、事態は一変する。1985年、中山さんの女優デビュー作となったTBS系ドラマ『毎度おさわがせします』の第1話が放送された翌日のことだった。 「さまざまな出演オファーが届き、電話が鳴りやまないんです」(前出・山中氏) 周囲から否定されても、それを支えてくれる多くの大人がいた。そんな後押しを感じていたのか、中山さんは懸命に走り続けたという。 キングレコードで中山さんの宣伝担当をしていた竹中善郎氏は当時、彼女が語った言葉が忘れられないでいる。 「デビュー前に“私、頑張りますから”って、私の目を真っすぐ見て言ったんです。その言葉どおり、美穂さんは本当にひたむきなんですよ。なんでも一生懸命やる。どんなに忙しくても弱音を吐かないし、熱が出ても休まない。口数の少ない子だから、自分から頑張っているなんて言わないけれど、伝わってくる。私も含め、みんなそういう彼女の姿に惹かれていきました」 ドラマ『毎度―』が放送された1985年の大みそか、日本レコード大賞の最優秀新人賞を受賞。15歳だった中山さんは涙を流して喜んだが、その夜に異変があった。 「授賞式の後、祝賀会があったのですが、美穂は30分ぐらいで“もう疲れたから帰りたい”と言う。大人の集まりですから、退屈なのだろうと思ったのですが……」(前出・山中氏、以下同) そうではなかった。中山さんが向かったのは、所属事務所。そこに大勢のファンが詰めかけていた。 「美穂は事務所にファンが集まるのを知っていたんです。だから、一刻も早くそこに行きたかった。彼女は一晩中、ファンの子たちと話していました。誰とでも分け隔てなく接する。それが彼女の魅力なんです」 その後、中山さんはトップアイドルへと駆け上がるが、その人柄は変わらなかった。…

『韓国大統領の弾劾訴追案を可決 職務停止に 戒厳令巡り』by「毎日新聞」

韓国の国会は14日午後、尹錫悦(ユンソンニョル)大統領に対する弾劾訴追案を可決した。野党や無所属議員の賛成に加え、保守系の与党「国民の力」の一部議員が賛成した。尹氏の大統領としての職務は停止され、当面の間、韓悳洙(ハンドクス)首相が権限を代行する。 投票の結果、賛成204、反対85、棄権3、無効8だった。与党議員のうち少なくとも12人が賛成票を投じた。 180日以内に憲法裁判所が弾劾訴追の是非を判断する。憲法裁が弾劾を認めれば、尹氏は罷免され、60日以内に大統領選が実施される。 尹氏が3日夜に宣布した「非常戒厳」を巡り、最大野党「共に民主党」など野党6党は「違憲」だと批判。尹氏の弾劾を求める議案は7日、国会での投票に与党議員のほとんどが参加せず廃案となったが、野党側は12日に2回目の弾劾訴追案を提出していた。 捜査当局は、内乱などの容疑で尹氏の立件を目指している。現職大統領には不訴追特権があるが、内乱罪は例外。尹氏は12日、「弾劾しようが捜査しようが、私はこれに堂々と立ち向かう」と述べている。 韓国大統領に対する弾劾訴追は3例目。2004年の盧武鉉(ノムヒョン)氏に対する弾劾訴追は憲法裁が棄却し、盧氏は罷免を免れた。16年の朴槿恵(パククネ)氏への弾劾訴追は憲法裁が妥当と判断。朴氏は罷免された。 韓国の尹錫悦大統領が弾劾訴追案を可決され、職務停止となりました。戒厳令を巡る問題が背景にあります。 先週の弾劾訴追案の採決をボイコットした与党「国民の力」は、今回は全員が参加しました。本会議は午後4時に始まり、1時間ほどで結果が出るという迅速さでした。 与党では「否決」の方針を維持したものの、縛りはかけず、結果として少なくとも12票の「造反」が出た形です。尹錫悦大統領が戒厳令を正当化したうえで「最後まで戦う」という発言をした後、与党内で「弾劾賛成」の雰囲気が広がりました。 現在、韓国の政治は民主化以降、最も荒れており、分裂も深刻化しています。ここで注目されるのは大統領代行を務める韓悳洙国務総理です。彼が韓国の政治を安定化させ、国民からの信頼を回復できるのか、または「敗戦処理投手」となるのかは、大統領代行の働きにかかっています。 また、憲法裁判所にて、今回国会で可決された弾劾訴追案に対する最終判決が下されるのは「180日以内」であることが示されています。これは約6ヶ月後に次の大統領選挙が前倒しで行われる可能性もあることを意味します。 尹大統領の弾劾は、アメリカでも特別な関心を呼んでいます。ドナルド・トランプ次期大統領が議会下院に弾劾訴追された事件との類似点が指摘されており、韓国の政治状況は、アメリカの人々に自国の民主主義の現状を再考させています。 “` (Note: The “ tag includes a placeholder URL for the image; please replace it with…

『【速報】25歳の米兵に懲役5年 少女誘拐暴行事件で那覇地裁 「少女の証言は信用できる」と判断』by「沖縄タイムス」

昨年12月、沖縄本島中部の公園にいた16歳未満の少女を車で自宅へ連れ去り、性的暴行を加えたとして、わいせつ目的誘拐、不同意性交の罪に問われた米軍嘉手納基地所属の空軍兵長の男(25)の判決公判が13日、那覇地裁であり、佐藤哲郎裁判長は懲役5年(求刑懲役7年)を言い渡した。佐藤裁判長は、少女の証言は信用できると判断したと述べた。 公判では、被害少女の年齢に対する被告の認識、同意の有無、わいせつ目的で連れ去ったか―などが主な争点となっていた。 兵長の男は少女の年齢を18歳と認識し、「性的行為に同意はあった」「(乗車させた時に)わいせつなことをする意図はなかった」などと無罪を主張していた。 Aさんが英語・日本語・ジェスチャーで自分の年齢を伝えたと証言し、このジェスチャーと見られる様子が防犯カメラ映像に残っていることなど、Aさんの証言がそのほかの証拠と整合声があると判断されていました。 求刑7年から5年に減刑された理由は、前科がないことや類似事案との比較が挙げられていました。 【那覇地裁に入る、被告を乗せたとみられる車両=13日午後1時29分、那覇市樋川(沖縄タイムス)】 補足 判決を傍聴しました。 裁判長が示した5つの争点と判断は次のとおりです。 被告人は被害者(Aさん)の年齢を認識していたか→認識していた 不同意わいせつではなく、不同意性交等にあたる行為があったか→あった Aさんは同意していたか→同意していなかった Aさんの同意がないことを被告人は認識していたか→「やめて」「ストップ」と言われた後も行為を続けた(同意がないことを認識していた) 被告人がAさんを車に乗せる際にわいせつ目的があったか→あった Aさんが英語・日本語・ジェスチャーで自分の年齢を伝えたと証言し、このジェスチャーと見られる様子が防犯カメラ映像に残っていることなど、Aさんの証言がそのほかの証拠と整合声があると判断されていました。 求刑7年から5年に減刑された理由は、前科がないことや類似事案との比較が挙げられていました。 「毎回思うが軽すぎるよ。被害者の事思うとたった5年(求刑でも7年)…やりきれないよ。」 「自分よりずっと体の大きい海外の男、しかも兵士に体を掴まれて、怖かっただろうな。言葉も通じないし。逆らったら何をされるかわかんないし。」 「屈強な軍人相手に少女が抵抗できるはずも無く、この手の犯罪は本当に卑劣だと思います。」 コメ数558、1位コメの「共感した」数は3099。 「【速報】25歳の米兵に懲役5年 少女誘拐暴行事件で那覇地裁 「少女の証言は信用できる」と判断」12/13(金) 14:04配信の沖縄タイムスの記事。 “`Note: The image source (`src`) should be…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *